WWE or TNA

Which do you prefer. I have to say WWE because they have the star power and they can have some good matches. I also just like the whole brand thing that they have. You can watch WWE 3 times a week. But I mostly like WWE because WWE is the big shot. If TNA were to be the big shot then Id choose them.

WWE is the better company even though they are not what they used to be. In a couple of years, maybe TNA can go head to head with them

If we are talking about better trained wrestlers , and better movesets , then I would say TNA , If we are talking about gimmicks and entertainment , then I would say WWE but overall I would rather watch TNA , they , in my opinion have some really great talent , and unlike WWE , TNA gives a push to everybody on the roster , and not the same people every week , which gets very boring , TNA also has a much younger roster than TNA , which is a lot better to have in lasting wrestlers , but if it came to me having a choice to choose between WWE or TNA , I would definitley say TNA

Well, I only just got Impact here (as of last week) and while the storylines suck the wrestling seems to be better.. well IS better and I like that most of TNA's roster isn't overly muscley and huge.
Then there is the women's division which is MUCH better in TNA and the crowd actually enjoys the matches. WWE's divas are learning more though and hopefully will start being known for their skills rather than their boobs.

So its kind of a hard choice to make, it depends on what you watch the show for because at the moment WWE and TNA are different which makes it enjoyable to watch both. I think if TNA had the money that WWE does it would definitely be the better show.

Soo... I'm going to go with TNA.

Edit: forgot to add:

Quote :

I also just like the whole brand thing that they have. You can watch WWE 3 times a week.

In regards to that I hate the 3 brands! I hate that wrestlers that I'd love to see feud probably won't because they're on the different brands (although this is getting better now that SD and ECW have their agreement). I wish there was only 1 brand that had 3 shows a week rather than 3 brands with 1 show each...

... which is another reason TNA is better.

I like some parts of TNA like the wrestling, but all the matches are about 2-5 minutes long, except the main event. The vast majority of Impact is lame promos and stupid gimmicks like Stone Cold Sharkboy & Curry Man. I pefer WWE's promos, gimmicks, but I do have to give TNA the wrestling, if they had longer matches. Do any of the guys even break a sweat? I suppose all-in-all I like the WWE product better.

I like the WWE better, but I think TNA is a nice alternative. TNA's women's division is much better than the WWE's. On the other hand, TNA's storylines are awful, and the promos aren't much better.

Well personaly, i prefer TNA of WWE. Honnestly WWE have been boaring and stale for far to long. It has been the same stars at the top for almost 4 years now. Its Cena, HBK, Triple H, Batista, Undertaker and Edge. Its getting boaring to see the same guys at the top.

If you look in TNA there have been some changes at the top from time to time and thats what i like from them. I could careless that they have lame promos and gimmiks. The reason i watch TNA is because they always come up with excellent wrestling matches and thats something the WWE was lacking of until a few weeks before Wrestlemania.

And CMHL, i dont mean to flame you or anything here, but saying that you prefer the WWE over TNA because WWE is the bigger company, is a prety lame reason in my opinion.

CMHL wrote:

But I mostly like WWE because WWE is the big shot. If TNA were to be the big shot then Id choose them.

I strongly disagree with that. As Martel said, it's not a very good reason. This is a reason why I don't like that idea. In Australia, I support an AFL club that hasn't won a Premership since 1980, and has had the worst win/loss record since the 80's. But, does that mean all their fans should just jump to a better club? no, because it's about what you like and what you believe in. I'll always love the team I support, and that will never change. But meh, this isn't about sport lmao.

TNA I think they are making a superior product. I'm also really excited with what they have been doing with the Knockout Division I can't remember the last pay-per-view that featured a women's cage match let alone two of them. I think Lockdown is going to be the first wrestling pay-per-view I've ordered since Wrestlemania 22.

Wrestling_God wrote:

I like the WWE better, but I think TNA is a nice alternative. TNA's women's division is much better than the WWE's. On the other hand, TNA's storylines are awful, and the promos aren't much better.

Agreed WG, except I must say I like TNA better than the WWE. I think TNA put on better matches, but as you said the promo's and storylines are not at all good. Given some more time, I think TNA will give WWE a run for its money. We just have to wait for the kids to get alittle older and relize their Batista's arent worth watching.

The Great Khali wrote:

I think TNA put on better matches, but as you said the promo's and storylines are not at all good.

I would agree with that. TNA also seems to allow there wrestlers to do more of the high risk move set, which is a big part of why there matches are better. Then again, they hold A LOT less shows, so they can probably get away with it.

for me its TNA all the way cant do with WWE storylines recently